Skip to content




Adopted Minutes
March 12, 2001
Special Board Meeting

Call to Order

The meeting was called to order at 6:04 p.m.

Roll Call

Present: Canady, Creamer, Jeffries, Holden, Patterson, Pelleran,
Absent: Rasmusson

(Trustee Rasmusson arrived at 6:54 p.m.)

Chair Jeffries stated that a request from MAHE was forwarded to the Board, which stated that they have a contractual right to respond to any recommendations that the President may make regarding faculty positions. At this point MAHE has not had the opportunity to present any recommendations and MAHE will be asked to respond in writing on or before noon on Friday, March 16. Therefore, the Board would be voting only on the Aviation program review recommendations because faculty positions are not affected. The Board will consider the remaining program review recommendations on Monday, March 19.

Additions/Deletions to the Agenda

The Board agreed to add under Limited Public Comment a MAHE presentation for seven minutes.

The Board agreed to move after Public Comment agenda item, Program Review Recommendations.

Limited Public Comment Regarding Agenda Items

President's Report Program Review Recommendations ?
President Paula D. Cunningham

President Cunningham thanked those who spoke at the February 19 Board meeting. She thanked the Board for patiently sitting for six hours and listening to everyone?s comments, and the community members for their involvement in the process.

President Cunningham stated that in June 2000, the Board of Trustees adopted a business plan. They unanimously adopted the strategic plan that involved internal and external constituencies. As a result of the plan, the community identified five areas of growth, which include math, automotive related areas, health care, developmental reading and writing, and financial assistance. In addition, the plan called for a review of all programs. The College is in the process of reviewing support services in areas such as Athletics, library services, counseling services, and tutorial services.

President Cunningham stated that since October 2000, $1 million has been cut in administrative costs and two full-time administrative positions have already been eliminated. All of the service areas have been charged to cut their budget by 10 to 12 percent in the next year. These additional dollars will be allocated to the five growing areas that were previously mentioned.

She said that although program review is not new to Lansing Community College, there is a history at the College of not taking program review very seriously. That perception has changed. She stated that many ideas that will be presented tonight have been offered to programs previously. She also noted that last year more than 1,000 students were served that needed developmental reading and more could have been served. Over 5,000 students were served in the area of developmental math and more could have been served. Virtual College doubled in size this year and 60 online courses have been developed and this number will increase to 100 courses over the next year. In the summer of 2000, 1% of LCC students used the Internet to register. In spring of 2001, 40% of LCC students registered online. From the Nursing Program, 126 students graduated and both Sparrow Hospital and Ingham Medical have stated that if 100 more nursing students graduated today they would hire all of them. In addition, the College is facing issues of faculty equity and a 147-year old building that will cost over $5 million to maintain over the next 10 years. Also, the College is facing the issue of the Capitol Outlay project of $52 million. If it is successful in getting funded by the State, the College would have to provide half of that in terms of matching funds. Following a public forum on February 9, a team of administrators (who hadn?t worked on program review previously) was formed to conduct a due diligence process for each program.

President Cunningham asked the due diligence team to present their findings for each program. She said the recommendation for the Court Reporting program is to suspend the Court Reporting Associate Degree Program and explore the feasibility of offering a one-year realtime reporting certificate program. President Cunningham asked Ms. Nancy Lombardi to report her team?s findings.

Ms. Nancy Lombardi reported the findings of the due diligence team that was assigned the Court Reporting associate degree program. She stated that court reporting and realtime reporting or captioning are two separate occupations. Although the Court Reporting Association states that only court reporters can do realtime reporting, that is not true. She said that anyone who knows how to use a stenographic machine effectively can do realtime reporting or captioning, the question is about skill sets. Therefore, the two issues -- court reporting and realtime reporting or captioning -- were separated and the team looked at the skill sets required for these occupations. To become a certified court reporter, the student has to demonstrate much higher levels of speed and accuracy than a realtime reporter, as well as demonstrate knowledge of law and court procedures, which is not required for realtime reporting or captioning.

In addition, she stated that there is no legal requirement that someone must be a court reporter to do realtime reporting or captioning. Ms. Lombardi said that the two-year court reporting degree program is very difficult to complete, requiring seven full-time semesters. And, although it has been stated that 100% of the program's graduates were placed, the program had only six graduates in the last two years. It has been stated that it is a certified Court Reporting program and it is not. The program is a National Court Reporting Association (NCRA) approved program. It does not graduate certified court reporters and the program could not provide any data on the number of graduates who have taken the court reporter test and passed it. Therefore, the team is recommending the associate degree program be discontinued and the division explore the feasibility of offering a shorter realtime reporting certificate program.

Ms. Lombardi addressed the issue of a $1 million grant and allegations that the College may lose the opportunity for this grant if the court reporting associate degree program is discontinued. However, there is no grant. The National Court Reporters Association (NCRA) is currently lobbying Congress to provide funding to support the Telecommunication Act of 1996, an unfunded federal mandate; there is currently no bills before Congress to fund the Act or support court reporting programs. The College will continue to pay dues to maintain the NCRA approval during the transition period.

President Cunningham stated that Ms. Lombardi had been in contact with many people from the NCRA and feels very comfortable with the accuracy of the information and recommendation.

President Cunningham then asked Ms. Pam Bergeron to speak on behalf of the recommendation for the Dental Assistant program. The recommendation is to suspend the program, but maintain its accreditation status.

Pam Bergeron reported that in a letter from President Cunningham dated 2/22/01 to The Michigan Dental Association liaison, Mr. Kris Nicholoff, recommendations for partnering were outlined that would enable LCC to continue to provide training for the Dental Assistant Program. The 4/27/01 response from Central District Dental Society (CDDS) stated CDDS would not contribute the suggested 94,000.00 to cover operating shortfalls in the Dental Assisting Program. However, this crisis has made them keenly aware of the need for a strategy to solve the problems of recruitment, and retention of an adequately trained workforce. Their research and ensuing discussions the weeks following the receipt of President Cunningham?s letter did help the Society understand the "hard economic and social realities of technical education." They agreed with the statement made by President Cunningham at their February 13 meeting, "it's not quite as simple as writing a check? Ms. Bergeron stated it is gratifying to realize that Central District Dental Society is taking an active part in solving this problem and that they are going to invest their time and money developing a strategy to recruit, retain and train dental personnel on a state wide basis. They added in their letter, ?It is the rare crisis that does not provide an opportunity. As a Board, we have been aware of the growing problem in personnel hiring, training an retention. We have naively waited for others to solve our problem. By being involved in the program closures at LCC over the past three weeks, it is now clear that there is not ?they,? there is only ?we.? Recognition that LCC cannot solve our personnel supply problem has moved us toward addressing the real underlying problems with recruitment, training, and retention." They thanked President Cunningham and the LCC Board of Trustees for their time and patience in educating them about the realities of the education business. They stated that the Board has a difficult task in balancing the educational wants and needs for a diverse community. They are very interested in partnering with LCC in the future. To that end, the College will extend the Dental Assistant Program accreditation for at least two years in the hopes the College will be at the table with them looking at how we can continue to provide dental assisting education in new cost effective ways in service to our community.

Ms. Bergeron stated she was grateful for all the dental assistant program had done in our community and that the program is leaving with the same integrity and reputation that it has maintained for the past 30 years. She said that she is very proud to have been a teacher in that program for 18 years. She is most proud of her colleagues, Vicki Spincich, Eileen Dean, Ann Berardo, Sherry Kohlmann, Sharon Neal, and all of the other professionals that have had such an impact, and for the leadership of Brenda Brown and Sally Deck in the past.

President Cunningham asked Mr. Tony Juliano to report on the Quality Assurance program. The recommendation is to discontinue the Quality Assurance associate degree program and integrate the current courses into the BCI for certification.

Mr. Juliano stated that the team reviewed the recommendation and looked at quality as a discipline. They talked to employers and to a quality manager. Quality control-related jobs and knowledge of quality are increasing. As the program continues to grow there may be a greater increase in Quality and the need for quality programs. In the same token, the kind of feedback the team received continues to indicate that employers are valuing experience rather than an associate degree in Quality Assurance and they're looking for the high-tech quality engineer or inspector with a bachelor?s or a master?s to work in high executive quality management positions. Mr. Juliano said that at LCC, quality assurance training is handled in three different ways. The Capital Quality Initiative (CQI) conducts monthly lectures, programs, and presentations and reaches out to all the community at the academic level. The Business and Community Institute gave 200 quality-related classes last year with 1,600 students enrolled. The Quality Assurance academic program continues to have small numbers of enrollments and in the last five years, the program has graduated 20 students. The recommendation is to discontinue the Quality Assurance Associate Degree Program and integrate the credit program in the academic area for the classes that are well attended into the BCI classes.

President Cunningham asked Mr. Juliano to also speak for the Medical Assistant program as he was part of that team as well. The recommendation is to suspend the program.

Mr. Juliano stated that medical assistants usually take one or two paths, which can be an administrative path or a clinical path. In terms of access, the American Association of Medical Assistants (AAMA) can certify someone as a medical assistant, but it is not a Michigan requirement that someone become certified. In addition, there is an alternative in the community that provides a training program, which is Ross Medical.

President Cunningham asked Mr. Ray Turner to speak for the Dance Program. She said that there has been miscommunication about the Dance Program. It was never the intention to eliminate all dance classes. The recommendation is to eliminate the Dance Program Associate Degree, but it is believed that there is a viable alternative for the more serious dance student to maintain the quality in dance.

Mr. Turner stated that Ms. Lombardi and he met with a number of people to discuss the future of dance at LCC in light of the recommendation. They looked at a couple of critical factors that they believed weighed heavily in favor of maintaining a viable presence for Dance at the College. He said that the cultural contribution that dance makes to the community and to the College is very significant. There was an assessment completed of access and in terms of access to college level dance education in the central Michigan area there is very little access. He said that the team concluded that the program and the College need a high quality presence for Dance at the College. The degree itself was not the first and foremost interest for dancers coming to LCC, but maintaining that high quality presence was. The team developed a plan and asked Ms. Missy Bischoff to discuss it. The recommendation is to maintain a foundation level of dance classes in all four of the major disciplines, increase course fees, and critically establish partnerships with local, professional dance companies for students to work with.

Ms. Bischoff stated what will be different is the associate degree will eliminated and instead there will be professional internships established with two professional dance companies in the area. There will be 2 to 12 credits required for the completion of the internship. She said that the College would maintain 10 course offerings per semester, which will include two levels of technique classes, which will hopefully feed into the internship. There will be one LCC-sponsored main stage production per year instead of two. In addition, one concert per year will be added that will be produced and presented by the partner dance company. She mentioned that Ms. Diane Newman, the founder and executive director of HappenDance--which is one of the dance companies that agreed to partner in this way--may stop by to discuss the terms of the internship, but had not arrived yet. Ms. Bischoff continued to explain the terms of the internship, which are that the interns would enroll for credit at LCC and pay the appropriate fees and tuition. The companies would provide them with advance technique training, teaching methods, performance opportunities, and administrative experience. Admittance to the internship would require a rigorous audition and interview with the companies. It would be a one-year commitment.

Mr. Turner stated that with the combination of maintaining the core level of courses that dancers need and having a place where they can go to further their training and experience at a professional level is a very creative solution to maintaining quality dance offerings at LCC.

President Cunningham asked Mr. Glenn Cerny to address the Aviation Program.

Mr. Cerny stated that the team worked with the Aviation administration and the advisory board. The original recommendation was to cancel both programs. The team reviewed the programs separately. He said that they looked at the airplane power plant maintenance, avionics and mechanics. They found that the MESA (Michigan Economic Securities Agency) data noted that there were limited opportunities. However, when local employers were reviewed such as AeroGenesis and United Air Express, they had expressed an urgent need for aircraft mechanics. They are going to need 40 to 60 aircraft mechanics a year. Therefore, the data changed dramatically.

Mr. Cerny said that the other component that the team reviewed was the program?s actual finances. The team did not have a good understanding of the market rates of what the College was charging and the College is charging under the market. The rates were brought back up to the market. Another component reviewed was partnerships. The key factor in that equation was AeroGenesis. He asked Mr. Armando Cardenas to discuss the partnership regarding the internship, scholarships and tuition reimbursement.

Mr. Cardenas thanked the President and stated that it was a pleasure working with her staff. He said that AeroGenesis is very excited in working with the College and the program. There will be a scholarship fund established. A subsidy will also be created for students to participate in the internship program.

Mr. Cerny stated that United Air Express also voiced an interest in the program. United Air Express will be working with Aviation to find ways to establish a partnership in terms of scholarship needs for students. He said that there is a nationwide shortage of airframe and power plant certified avionics individuals beginning wages for local jobs are $13 to $15 an hour. Over a two-year period, it can get up to $23. The other component is that the skill levels can be translated out of the aviation area. The recommendation changed for the aforementioned reasons.

President Cunningham stated that this could not have been accomplished without the efforts of Mr. Cerny, Mr. Whipple, AeroGenesis, and the Aviation Program staff involved. She stated that Avionics and Maintenance will be a separate program and Flight will be separated. She asked Mr. Cerny to address the Flight Program.

Mr. Cerny stated even though flight is part of the aviation industry it employs a different mix of people. The one key component in the flight area is that the rates were approximately $10,000 below the market rate. The team realized that the College needed to raise their rates in an orderly fashion, but very quickly. Therefore, by fall 2001 the team is recommending the fees increase significantly to cover the costs in the fuel, insurance, and all other components that over a 10-year period eroded the base. Other components that were reviewed was the size, in terms of the fleet, and the target markets for Aviation. Mr. Cerny stated that the team looked at market rates and increased the course fees and looked at targeting the personal interest pilot. The fleet will be sized down from 10 to 7.

President Cunningham thanked the community for their partnerships and these have resulted in a little over a half million dollars. She said that is what the College means when it can no longer continue to subsidize on its own. At the beginning of the process, 10 full-time equated positions were recommended for elimination prior to business and industry stepping up to the plate. Now 5 or 6 full-time equated positions are recommended. She stated that Ms. Diane Newman, from HappenDance, had arrived and asked her to make some comments.

Verbatim transcript:

Diane Newman - With the elimination of the dance program we believed high quality dance in our community would be in danger. We are talking about an ecology out of balance. If you threaten a species habitat, its chances of survival will diminish. When I founded the company in 1976, HappenDance had both MSU and LCC's dance programs to draw dancers from for its professional employment. A very healthy habitat in which we could survive and develop and we did, but the MSU dance department was eliminated in the 80s so you can understand my concern about the future of the Dance Program at LCC and my excitement about the proposal that is before you. Happendance has managed to find the resources to pay its dancers for rehearsals and for performances and to raise the money to produce its shows and has a healthy bottom line. The biggest threat to our security of late is not the funding picture that nonprofits are challenged by, but rather where are we going to find quality, professional dancers to hire. Our dancers typically live and work in the Lansing community and raise families here and train here. I support this new proposal primarily because it offers an internship program that would allow talented individuals to study intensively at HappenDance School and with our professional company based on their experience and ability. After completing the certification process these individuals may meet criteria for becoming an employed artist with HappenDance. These are outcomes that serve many. LCC can place trained dancers in paying jobs and HappenDance can find and employ quality professionals and the community-at-large reaps the rewards of artists in its midst. It is a real creative solution and it is my hope that you, the Board of Trustees, will find significant merit in the solution and will decide in favor of continuing the Dance Program here.

Sally Pierce - Well, my remarks are not completely applicable partly because you listened to me, so thank you. I sent an email to these guys at seven o?clock on Sunday night and raised some contract concerns. And I still have some contract concerns, but it is good to know I will have an opportunity to respond to the program revisions.

Let me tell you where I am still at and what I'm still concerned about. I was very relieved to hear about Aviation and Avionics. My first response was ?thank God, you know, Dennis is not going to have to worry about health care for his family?. And my second response was ?good, Julie is not going to have to look for work.? And my colleagues around me say ?see that's your problem, Sally, you are always thinking about those individuals instead of the big picture. I think I think about both. I want to say that MAHE is very happy that together faculty and management were able to find solutions. We think that should happen more often around here. But let me tell you what I'm really still concerned about. I'm listening to people talk about solutions, wonderful solutions where classes are still going to be taught. Perhaps programs are even going to be saved and yet faculty with many years of experience with the institution are being called and told ?don't come back in August, your skill set doesn?t match anymore, we don't need you anymore? and that's a problem. I'm being told that cost is an issue and that in two programs, specifically, even though courses will run in Quality and courses will run in Dance, that full-time faculty will not be allowed to fill loads with those courses and that's disturbing to me. Particularly since there is another piece of my contract language you should look at in addition to page 41. Page 41 does not say I have to respond in writing, it says that I can respond. But I'll be happy to respond in writing that seems to be the effective mode for me. I do teach in the Writing Department, so responding in writing is not a problem for me.

Another piece of contract language I'm concerned about, which I brought the contract language for you. I?d be happy to supply anyone who wants a contract for the association. There is a piece of contract language, page 2 in the contract, it says ?the Board agrees it shall not terminate or cause loss of benefits to any present full-time members of the bargaining unit solely for the purpose of utilizing part-time or other employees to perform bargaining unit services? and to me that includes cost savings. Even though we are all concerned about return on investment and Glenn taught me what ROI means. My vocabulary is continually expanding. It's not just about ROI. People have been at this institution for many years and have many skill sets and I would like to see those people use those skill sets in existing programs if those programs are still here. People are finishing degrees so they are going to need certain courses for degrees while they're finishing degrees and people are going to be taking courses after that. So to say to somebody you don't come back in August, seems premature to me and frankly not acceptable. that's one concern.

I'm really happy that some faculty members were consulted in Dance and community people were consulted in Dance about internships, but I'm concerned about how that fits in the recognition clause, which is on page 1, and it may fit just fine. I know there are traditional internships on campus and we don't make all those people join the union or anything like that. But on the other hand given the climate I'm in, I hope you can forgive me for being somewhat suspicious.

What does MAHE want? MAHE would like for existing faculty full and part time to have some priority in the job?(???inaudible). that's not in the contract. that's not a contractual right. We don't have a seniority system in the contract. But it seems to me that after 20 some years in the institution there might be some moral imperative. I'm going to call on that because when it is not in the contract you go to morals. I think that is what Tom Ferris taught me at one point. And the second thing is we need to talk about commitment to staffing sections with full-time faculty if full-time faculty are available. We?d be happy to explore dual appointments if that's an option so if there aren?t enough credits in one department to maintain staff position. A person would make up credits in another department and we want to be creative we want to work with you. And we don't want people teaching what they are not qualified for at all. That would not be good for students and that would not be good for education. Our first concern is quality education.

I had a call at three o?clock Friday just before I talked to the team that was telling me about what the recommendations were going to be. I got a call from a faculty member who told me that her degrees were not the qualifications anybody needed for people to teach Dance here at LCC anymore. That is what she had been told on the phone and that hurt me. I wasn't involved in the phone call, so I don't know, but I know that, I'm sitting here looking going well, you got somebody with a BFA, MFA, and credentials in teaching Dance and I don't understand why that wouldn?t be a good thing and as far as I know there have been no questions raised about the quality of her instruction or about the quality of her work at LCC. And my thing is, so if it is a misunderstanding and if we have a miscommunication then let?s work it out and figure out what is not being communicated well.

I'm very concerned about hearing what is going on with the Court Reporting program because your numbers and the numbers that I heard from my colleague don't exactly match, but I don't like to call anybody a liar and I would prefer to believe that the truth is probably somewhere in the middle or somewhere else and I want to get that stuff straight. that's what MAHE wants. MAHE wants to get it straight, MAHE wants to work with you, MAHE is not saying you don't have a right to cut programs, of course you have the right to cut programs, but please don't do it on the backs of faculty, and please don't ask faculty to take it in the name of equity and what is necessary to do for the strategic plan. We want to do what's right for the strategic plan, but we want to also do what's right for the individuals here and that's it.

George Carr - I'm on the Aviation Technology Advisory Committee. I want to thank the President and the Board of Trustees for their interest and their personal time in working with the Aviation program. I think it speaks highly of all of you for your community involvement. It's often said that it is easier to criticize than it is to create. I think after we got over the issue of if the program had merit, the real work begins with how do you restructure the program. That is where a lot of folks put their nose to the grindstone and came up with what looks to be a very workable program that will benefit both the College and the community.

Todd Heywood - I think the recommendations are a nice step forward towards compromise. I think there are issues that need to be dealt with first and that is we still have not looked at the entire budget and its really hard to start making cuts of the product before you cut the fat. I encourage you to demand a complete analysis of the budget before you go all the way through. I would also remind the three of you that are up for election that there are 12 people who have already taken packets and that is double what ran at the last election and it means that people are upset at what is happening at this college.

Melissa DeMong, President of the Michigan Association of Professional Court Reporters - I can't refute your graduate numbers, I can shed some light on tracking the number of people passing the certified shorthand reporters test that the state puts on. I can comment on the MESA report and I still think that due diligence hasn?t been completely followed in that because court reporters are hired as independent contractors so that doesn?t show up as a MESA item. There is a difference between realtime reporters and captioning and court reporting, but a skill is still a skill. Students still have to come down here and learn the machine and that takes time. There are over 28 million Americans that are considered deaf or hard of hearing so this becomes a question for what are we doing for them it is also for the school a question of economics. We have been fighting for an unfunded federal mandate, but if it was funded then I wouldn?t have to be here. So, this federal mandate is for $1 million per year for five years. I would encourage you to wait to see what happens with the grant.

John Lakin - It has been about three weeks since the announcement of the closure of the Aviation Department as well as the other programs. We appreciate the hard work that Glenn Cerny, Lee Whipple, and President Cunningham as well as the aviation faculty and staff have done in the past three weeks. All the people involved spent many hours working through strategies and models to make the Aviation Program a viable part of the College and the community. I enjoyed, even thought it has been hard, working through these problems, which will make our Aviation Program stronger and more cost effective.

Ron Onufer - Since the story broke about the draft recommendations you knew you were going to take a hit from the community. You took it with grace, yes, you can be my president. Obviously, I'm a happy guy because the ultimate recommendation to the Board is coming out in favor of the Aviation department. I would hope that if this takes some sort of revisiting of the mission of the College, feel free to tack on one additional phrase ?and oh, yes, we teach people to fly.?

Ruby Ivens - I prepared a statement, but I want to start by thanking the people who are here to listen to what I have to say. I want to thank the Board and the President, Tony Juliano and Barbara Larson for their participation in the due diligence, but I wanted to also speak for someone that has not been mentioned tonight. I was getting ready to come tonight and a student, Erica Flanory, who was one of my first students right out of high school and asked if they were really going to cancel the program. I said ?well, I don't know.? ?Why didn?t they ask us, why didn?t they talk to us students. Why didn?t they keep us informed? They should have called us and asked what we thought of the program and what we thought of the future for students.? And she said, ?I am a customer of this school.? And I asked her, ?what does an associate degree mean to you?? And she said that it means that, ?I studied enough to earn a degree that I can be proud of.? I said, ?how about a certificate? and she said, ?I might just as well go to another school.? I believe that there is no need to eliminate the associate degree for Quality Assurance at this time. This is a Perkins funded program so we get extra money from the State for it. It is only in the past week that the BCI folks and the program folks have come together to come up with an alternative way of articulating classes from business and industry to the degree program. I think that you can see this in the recommendation, which states, ?integrate current credit quality courses in BCI training.? So why eliminate the associates degree at this time? Let us have a chance to work on it and see before you discard one of the most attractive features of the program. Second, the information you have received is far too vague to pass judgment at this time. Further, the rationale can be interpreted to support the associates degree. The recommendation states in part, ?discontinue the quality assurance associates degree, integrate?? and it gets pretty vague. However, information supplied to support the recommendation is inconsistent with this recommendation.

Douglas Smith - I am an advocate for maintaining the Quality Assurance program as it exists. The concern that I have is towards the delivery of the knowledge that is required to be able to be a quality professional. Degrees are necessary. There is no other place where the knowledge can be accessed. The focus of the due diligence committee has been addressing the training needs of the employers in the community not the training needs of the students.

Joe Ross, President of Communications and Research - One of our specialties is workforce development as well as economic development. In terms of the economy the real workforce engine that our jobs really come from. What I'm concerned about in the tri-county area, there are going to be 10,000 young adults graduating from our high schools as well as our local colleges. This happens every year. On average it's about 10,000 kids. we're losing them at an incredible rate, when looking at curriculum choice I would really encourage that we try to find areas of curriculum that are going to keep these kids in the area. One such area where jobs are in demand are in computer engineers, physicians, mechanical engineers as well as accountants and auditors. In the next four years, we're projecting that we're going to need 16,000 of these people in our workforce and these are jobs that will make a minimum of $40,000 with incredible benefits. I'm glad to see these discussions are taking place and I think our hope to retain some of our students and try to fill these jobs in these categories is through LCC because those jobs and others don't require a four year degree and I think LCC is the only place we have hope to train those people.

Program Review Recommendations

IT WAS MOVED by Trustee Pelleran and supported by Trustee Holden to approve the President's program review recommendations regarding the Aviation Program.

Trustee Pelleran stated she was pleased with the process in involving the community. She complimented the committee and the administration in continuing to find creative answers to solutions.

Ayes: Canady, Creamer, Jeffries, Holden, Patterson, Pelleran, Rasmusson
Nays: None
Absent: None

Motion carried.

IT WAS MOVED by Trustee Canady and supported by Trustee Holden to approve the President's program review recommendations regarding the Flight Program.

Trustee Creamer asked if the College would be selling all of the available inventory that could be sold without impacting the program.

President Cunningham responded that there are 10 aircraft now, 1 helicopter and that number will be reduced to seven that, which will still allow growing the program.

Gayland Tennis responded that the College would be selling everything other than the seven aircraft that will be used for flying.

Trustee Creamer stated that a number of people spoke about the greatest opportunity to build revenues was not only raising fees, but also being more creative with the available flight hours.

President Cunningham stated that the flight hours would be increased from five days to six days, which will increase the hours.

Mr. Lakin stated that it is being proposed to go to an eight-week segment rather than 16 as well as stretching it to six days a week rather than five days week. This increase will allow the program doubling up the students using the same amount of instructors, which will increase the availability of the aircraft, utilization, and using 97% efficiency with instructors and the aircraft.

Trustee Creamer asked management to discuss with the unions if there is a creative way to increase flight hours for interested instructors. He said that a lot could be done to improve niche programs such as the Aviation program. He would be in favor of allocating marketing dollars to accomplish this.

Trustee Holden asked how many personal interest students are there versus career students enrolled.

Mr. Lakin responded that there weren?t very many. Marketing has not been done aggressively, but the Program will be focusing their efforts on recruiting personal interest students.

Trustee Patterson thanked AeroGenesis for coming to the table. It is clear signal that this region is open for business. Program review is about changing the way business is done. It is not about ruthlessly cutting programs; it is about looking at programs that no longer have their original intent. He thanked President Cunningham and the administration for their work with program review.

Chair Jeffries was concerned with being underfunded for insurance purposes and what liability that could impose on the institution and suggested that this be reviewed with more detail. He thanked AeroGenesis, LCC staff and the Aviation Advisory Committee. He feels this was a great example that the College can model in terms of what the positives are to program review, which are partnerships that can be developed within the College and the external stakeholders. He said that the other 12 programs could be reviewed in the same creative and innovative way.

Ayes: Canady, Creamer, Jeffries, Holden, Patterson, Pelleran, Rasmusson
Nays: None
Absent: None

Motion carried.

The Board took a short recess at 7:38 p.m.

Board reconvened at 7:50 p.m.

President's Report

Informational Items

Negotiations-

The Board would go into closed to discuss negotiations.

Closed Session

IT WAS MOVED by Trustee Rasmusson and supported by Trustee Creamer to go into closed session to discuss negotiations.

Ayes: Canady, Creamer, Jeffries, Holden, Patterson, Pelleran, Rasmusson
Nays: None
Absent: None

Motion carried.

The Board returned to open session at 8:35 p.m.

Trustee Canady left at 7:40 p.m.

Roll Call

Present: Creamer, Holden, Jeffries, Patterson, Pelleran, Rasmusson
Absent: Canady

Public Comment

There was no public comment.

Adjournment

The meeting adjourned at 8:36 p.m.

LCC Board of Trustees
Administration Bldg
Phone: (517) 483-5252
Additional contact information »

Facebook Twitter YouTube Flickr